Apparently Labour has a Brexit strategy, they will scrap the Brexit White paper and emphasise the benefits of the common market and the customs union. Given the current parlous nature of the l;abour party, one might actually have more faith in Open Britain, which is aiming to garner support to remove hard brexiteers from their marginal seats in the upcoming election. Does this mean that we are moving away form a party politics system to an agenda/policy driven one? There also seems to be an increase in younger people registering to vote, which will also raise the pro EU sentiments.
This evening, the Independent claimed that President Trump would be shutting down the open access climate and environmental data of the EPA on Friday 28th April this week. Reading the story and also checking with a Forbes article on the same subject, suggests that this is actually a more complicted situation. The EPA site will be one of many governments sites to close down if POTUS forces a government shutdown by not signing funding bill. The question will then be whether there will be sufficient government funding afterwards for the EPA site when it comes back online.
The story reflects a bigger issue, and that is the susceptibility of centrally held data and systems to failure and loss of funding, or the vagaries of policy changes. Kalev Leetaru, data and society commentator for Forbes looks at the balance between centralised and distributed data and the pros and cons of control being with a major corporation or government in his article at https://www.forbes.com/sites/kalevleetaru/2017/04/24/no-the-epas-open-data-website-is-not-going-away-the-future-of-open-science-data/#1b42eaab18b5
No comments:
Post a Comment